Now here’s the truth

by Cameron Slater on November 6, 2017 at 9:00am

Climate Conversation writes 

For 20 years there’s been no local warming — NIWA’s own figures prove it, contradicting their endless public statements. Why don’t they admit this in public? Why do they tell us a different story? Why do the PM’s Chief Science Advisor, Sir Peter Gluckman, and the previous Commissioner for the Environment, Dr Jan Wright, BOTH talk about warming when it hasn’t been happening? Could they have been deceived by NIWA and the Royal Society? I lump them in together because most of the climate panel on the RS are NIWA scientists. They’ve been in bed together on climate, with the IPCC, for decades.

How did I discover this? A few days ago I picked up the Royal Society report, Human Health Impacts of Climate Change for New Zealand, and the very first sentence (highlighted above) rang alarm bells:

In the Australasian region our climate is changing.

Now, most readers know there has been no significant global warming for about 20 years. They also know that the climate has been changing for millions of years, so on the face of it this is a true statement. However, with climate language twisted completely out of shape by environmental propaganda over the last 30 years, “climate change” now means man-made warming. Beware denials, for they are coming, but when they say ‘changing’ they actually mean ‘warming’.

Christopher Monckton was tracking the lack of warming evident in the RSS dataset, which grew to 18 years and 9 months before the El Nino of 2016 set in with higher temperatures. Since the El Nino ended a few months ago, temperatures have been subsiding, and last month returned to previous levels.

But the RS was talking about Australia and New Zealand, not the globe, so I wondered how local temperatures were tracking. NIWA’s website displays the 7SS and on looking closely it was hard to see a trend one way or the other over about the last 20 years.

So I downloaded the 7SS data and, taking it from 1998 to the present because that’s what the IPCC used in discussing the global “pause” in AR5, tried graphing the last 19 years. Here’s the result:

You can see there’s an insignificant cooling trend of 0.0012°C/year (0.12°C/100 yrs). In other words, no warming and no cooling. It reflects quite accurately the widely acknowledged hiatus in the global mean surface temperature.

New Zealand needs to know this.

He later added

For the national temperature record, the 7SS, NIWA have collected the data, checked it, adjusted it, approved it and published it on their website, so they can scarcely now argue with it. But, on the other hand, it’s totally at odds with what they say in public. Note to MSM: this ought to be front-page news.

And in the meantime, we have our politicians running around like the sky will fall within our lifetime.  Implementing all kinds of taxes and social costs to ‘save’ us all.

It doesn’t help that our own “scientific” watchdogs such as NIWA have become so indoctrinated that they’ll even ignore their own data.  I guess they feel there is safety in numbers as much as there is safety in not upsetting a government with the inconvenient truth:  that this Climate Thing was an embarrassing mistake and we need to back out of that now.

Kate Stewart: Should a white girl dress as Moana?

CULTURE CLASH: The Disney character Moana, a strong-minded role model for children.

As a self-confessed PC despiser, I’ve grown accustomed to the many absurd and outrageous calls for modifications to our behaviour.

With the passing of Halloween, ask yourselves this: How many white girls, oops … not gender neutral enough, how many white children did you see in Moana costumes?

Probably none, because it was deemed not PC, with some telling wannabe white wearers to stick to Snow White. That view could be seen as racist and culturally insensitive but probably won’t rank a mention, even though follow-up tweets came with a threat of physical violence.

According to one parenting activist, dressing children up as Disney’s Moana this Halloween would have been racist.

Writing in her blog Raising Race Conscious Children, parent blogger activist Sachi Feris urged parents not to dress their children up as characters from backgrounds different to their own as it “makes fun of someone else’s culture”.

Although many would see the strong-minded Moana as a perfect role model, Feris said it’s racially insensitive and risks parodying Polynesian culture. How is it that every time skin colour is involved it insidiously gets turned into a racial issue?

Do we have a barrage of fair-skinned people telling darker-skinned folk that they may not wear the costumes of traditionally white characters such as ghosts, Freddy Kruger or Morticia or don the white mask from Scream?

It appears we are wanting to apply limitations to only a certain group of people. If whites were to make such a call about costumes of white characters, they’d be labelled as racist, bigoted and un-PC.

Do the supposed oppressed get to have it all while others can only have what they are permitted to have?

Us and them – is this what being overly PC has reduced us to? An almost separatist type of behaviour. It’s disturbing.

The article highlighting the Moana issue was published with responding tweets. One argued that if we promote separate Halloween costumes based on colour, how much longer before we’re back to drinking at separate water fountains.

And why are examples of black against white racism never highlighted or publicised?

If the “N” word is deemed offensive, is it any worse than my red-haired son being called a Ranga – as in orangutan? I find this term equally as racist but, because he’s not black, when I complained it was fobbed off as just “kids being kids”.

Had my son retaliated and labelled his non-white verbal abuser a rock ape, he might have been suspended from school. Both terms refer to hairy primitive beasts so how can one be deemed as harmless teasing and the other as racist? Talk about double standards.

What sort of message are we sending when it’s okay to make derogatory remarks about a white person’s colour – it doesn’t seem like fair treatment by my understanding of the terms, let alone politically correct.

I thought the whole concept of being PC was to help build bridges, not burn them.

I once thought that being PC was just annoying and pointless, today I firmly believe it’s doing more harm than good.

The decision by Middlemore Hospital not to associate itself with a Ronald McDonald House due to its link with fast food and, thus, childhood obesity emphasises my point.

We now live in a society where you can’t even look at someone for fear of being labelled a pervert or invading their personal space. Fathers are afraid to bath their baby daughters due to possible false allegations of child abuse and kids are going off the rails like never before as we pander to the PC trend of letting them express themselves however they bloody well wish. No labels, no judgement, no restrictions.

Despite our bid to appear forward-thinking, we must stop and ask ourselves if maybe we’ve actually taken a few steps back.

The PC brigade should be educating us that racism is not as simple as white against black. Two races of the same colour can despise one another, just as blacks can be intolerant of whites. No one ethnicity or skin colour has the monopoly on racism. It can affect us all.

Mark my words, if this madness continues it will only be a matter of time before the All Blacks will be looking for a new name.

All Whites were a target as raciest name, and they wanted that changed.

 

Labour can’t do maths, again, and remain at sea about real numbers

by Cameron Slater on November 4, 2017 at 11:30am

via Yahoo!

Only one week into the job new Police Minister Stuart Nash is already feeling the heat and walking back his own half-baked ideas, National’s Police Spokesperson Chris Bishop says.

“Having just floated the idea of recruiting new police staff from overseas to meet the Labour/NZ First promise of 1800 new officers, Nash has now backtracked completely, ruling out the idea after pressure from the Police Association and his own Cabinet colleague.”

“This is amateur hour stuff. Almost immediately after having been signed-up to the 1800 new Police staff by the Labour/NZ First Agreement, Mr Nash was preparing New Zealanders for failure, saying the target was “aspirational” only, there would in fact be fewer, and not all would be sworn officers.

“Then came the floating of the migrant cop idea, before the immediate slap down from Nanaia Mahuta – and the Police – who rightly pointed out it should be New Zealanders doing the job and they should be properly trained.”

“Like his colleagues, Mr Nash is quite clearly making it up as he goes along. New Zealanders deserves better.”

“I suspect another reason the policy’s been ditched is that it was obviously embarrassing for Labour to admit yet another sector of the economy would require “special visas” – meaning the government allowing people in only where it suits them – in defiance of their own policy of slashing migration.

“Poor Mr Nash has had to take one for the team so Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway can desperately try and make his own target.”

“It hasn’t taken long for divisions to become apparent even with Cabinet Ministers from the same party, let alone within the Coalition.

“Furthermore, Labour need to be upfront about the cost of their commitment to 1800 new police. As Nash even admits, with natural attrition in the sector, 3000 extra police will actually have to be recruited to meet the government’s target. Like with the rest of their costings, the Labour/NZ First/Greens government is fudging the numbers and hoping the problem will just go away. It won’t.”

3,000 new police. Of which 1,600 are just to replace those who are not good at it or are burnt out.

The remaining 1,400 will have a number of people from overseas.  Together with their families, they will need a place to live.  Space to drive.  Hospitals and schools to use.

There is a dark poetic beauty to Labour’s solutions in as much that one policy does not lock in with their others.

And we might as well laugh because you and I will be paying for it.  Well into the next National government.

Apparently it is National’s fault people are killing themselves on the road

by Cameron Slater on November 5, 2017 at 7:30am

via RNZ

One of the more stupid new ministers, Julie Anne Genter has blamed the previous government for the high road toll this year…seriously.

The new Government minister in charge of road safety is appalled at the rising road toll in recent years.

“It’s absolutely tragic and it’s unacceptable that the previous National Government chose not to make safety a top priority in transport funding and policy. This new Government will,” Julie Anne Genter said.

 

Given her logic, Labour and the Greens and in particular Julie Anne Genter are responsible for the seven road deaths in the past 5 days.

The Police though realise what the real problem is:

Police say drivers need to take greater responsibility for their actions and they’re urged to reflect back on when they first passed their driver’s licence.

“The reason you got your licence was because you weren’t drunk when you did the test. You did wear your seatbelt. You weren’t driving too fast and you weren’t on your cellphone,” Superintendent Greally said.

Only the most truly nasty politician would blame the road toll on a government. According to Julie Anne Genter the individual who was drunk, distracted or speeding isn’t responsible at all for their own death or that of others, it is the evil previous government.

With true stupidity like this she will regret those words. She has stated she will stop the road toll, essentially. She will be held to account for those comments…this year, next year and for the next three years while she is charge.

To the minister, does she stand by all her statements? If not, why not?

Judith Collins will make mince-meat of this muppet.

NZ Journalist Slams World Rugby’s Decision To Select South Africa Over Ireland

BY  · 

“You can vote for money. Or you can vote for beer and laughter and fellowship.”

Mark Reason is a bit of an outspoken journalist, that tends to piss a lot of people off most of the time, but he’s absolutely bang on the money this time round if you ask us.

In his latest piece he discusses World Rugby’s decision to recommend the South Africa as host nation for the 2023 Rugby World Cup and he believes the entire process is a farce and he has some very valid points.

He believes smaller nations might as well forget about attempting to host rugby’s showpiece event going forward based on the current evaluation process.

“In fact no smaller nation has the slightest chance of ever again holding a Rugby World Cup if we are going to play be these rules. In future only England, France, South Africa and Australia need apply because the evaluation process appears to be rigged. And here’s how.
Although it carries the smallest weighting of the five categories, ‘organisation and schedule’ was perhaps the most symbolic in terms of Ireland’s doomed bid. World Rugby could in fact re-name this category ‘Catch 22.’
One of the requirements is that the “bid demonstrates the host nation has substantial experience in hosting major events.” In other words Ireland was stuffed from the get go. How are you ever going to get experience of hosting a major event, if the requirement of hosting a major event is to have experience of hosting a major event?”

A valid point. How is Ireland supposed to gain this experience if no one is willing to give them a shot to begin with? He also questions the ‘Venues and Host Cities’ category, with some valid points.

The same thing happened to Ireland around the category ‘Venues and Host Cities’. Despite the fact that their bid is a remarkable symbol of unification between the two old foes of rugby and Gaelic football, the south and the north, Ireland were once more marked down because they would be upgrading some of their venues. This is apparently unacceptably risky.
You have to laugh at such an assessment when everything that South Africa says is taken at face value. The French federation is also furious, pointing out “blatant errors” and “incompetence” to World Rugby Chairman Bill Beaumont over the assessment of their stadia availability, hotels and drug testing programme. Yet South Africa, the politically most unstable of the three countries by far, a nation that was on the brink of sending the last World Cup into chaos, has had everything taken on trust.

When it comes to transport and finance, it’s more of the same.

The judges even slaughtered Ireland in the transport category, but scored South Africa equally with them in the security category. Well, if being car-jacked is your thing, then I guess that makes a lot of sense. But really?
And of course South Africa won the part of the bid called ‘Financial, Commercial and Commitments’. In other words they pledged the most money. Ireland offered $230 million with a government payment guarantee, France offered $288 million underwritten by the government (ooh, score them down) and South Africa offered $307 million with a government guarantee.

Reason has urged New Zealand and the other nations, to ignore World Rugby and hand the tournament to Ireland.

But New Zealand and all the other unions who are due to vote on November 15, you don’t have to go along with all this spreadsheet sewage. You can still vote for the craic. You can still vote for a game that unifies a country. You still can vote for a World Cup that will bring improved stadia to a Celtic tiger that lost its roar long ago. You can still vote for some of the best fans in the world.
The choice is yours. You can vote for money. Or you can vote for beer and laughter and fellowship. It used to be what sport was all about.

Collins body slams Twyford and Nash

It was a pleasure to watch Judith Collins on the AM show brilliantly counter Phil Twyford. Twyford was attempting to defend MP Stuart Nash’s claim that National didn’t put more police officers on the beat. I think we can expect to enjoy more political body slams from her over the next three years.

 

Judith Collins is rubbishing Labour’s claims the previous Government didn’t put more cops on the beat.

Newly inducted Police Minister Stuart Nash made the claim earlier this week.

“That’s complete rubbish,” Ms Collins – a former Police Minister – told The AM Show on Friday.

Don’t hold back Judith, tell us what you really think.

“I think Stuart was probably out of Parliament when we brought in 600 extra frontline police, 300 into Counties Manukau policing district – in other words, south Auckland – and the other 300 around the country. Six-hundred more police we delivered, over nine years.”

Ms Collins said she’s owed an apology from Mr Nash.

“He should actually ring me and apologise. He’s got my number.”

Mr Nash may have been referring to the police-public ratio, which fell over the nine years National was in power. In 2008 there was one police officer for every 488 Kiwis, but by last year it had fallen to one for every 526 – despite growing demand.

If Nash was, in fact, referring to the police-public ratio his words were both deceptive and inaccurate because 600 extra frontline police were delivered by the National government. Isn’t it interesting how the Newshub journalist is trying to provide an explanation in an attempt to justify Nash’s deceptive claim?

“They effectively froze police staffing for nine years,” Labour’s Phil Twyford, appearing alongside Ms Collins, said.

During the election campaign, National promised 1100 more police staff, including 880 extra officers. The new Government is aiming for 1800 new sworn officers over the next three years. Ms Collins doubts it can be done.

Given the facts, I would suggest that Judith is right. If National promised 880 new Kiwi cops and was only able to deliver 600 then it is extremely unlikely that Labour by promising an even less attainable number will be able to do better.

“Where are you going to get them from? We’ve got the lowest unemployment we’ve had for years,” she said, before turning to Mr Twford and saying: “You don’t like foreigners so you can’t bring them in, so what are you going to do?”

Mr Twyford said the Government would be looking to recruit from overseas.

So there you have it. Labour will attempt to beat National’s record of 600 Kiwi cops by bringing in a foreign police force. What’s the bet most will be from Britain, a nation where cops spend their time harassing people for what they say online about terrorists when they are not putting their lives on the line during terror attacks.

Armed British Transport Police Specialist Operations officers wait to board a Virgin train to Birmingham New Street at Euston station in London

Andrew Dickens on the pain and who will suffer it when it comes

by Cameron Slater on November 4, 2017 at 9:30am

Credit: Comrade Jacinda FB pageJacinda

Andrew Dickens writes at the NZ Herald:

I wonder if everyone, particularly the poor, are aware of how much pain we need to bear before we get to the gain we’ve been promised.

Any change of government results in uncertainty, but when a government promises to be transformative then a wise person knows that things are going to get worse before they get better.

So first of all. Noticed the price of petrol going up? As the market waits for what is going down with policy settings, the dollar is also going down. And that means petrol is going up. It is what it is. But that hurts the poor more than the rich, who don’t notice a cent here or there.  

 

And house prices are falling, which will mean negative equity for many, especially those who went out on a limb and borrowed the maximum within the rules their incomes would allow.

But hold on – there’s also the Auckland regional fuel tax of 10 cents a litrewhich was the first policy off the rank. There’s another cost.

The fascinating thing is, that tax will pay for infrastructure to provide public transport so the poor can still get around the city. But that won’t be in place for years and in that time the working poor still have to get to their workplaces. By car. Paying 10 cents a litre more. Again, the rich will suck that up no problem. But the poor won’t.The poor are being asked for a donation to help themselves. Not very Labour I would think. Normally they’d ask the rich to pay for the improvements to the poor’s lot. That would probably be congestion taxes. User pays. Hit the fat cats coming into Auckland central to the highrise head offices would be the normal Labour way. But no.

And so the list goes on.

The warnings of pay pressure and the resultant strikes in an environment of emboldened unions. The threat of trade negotiation breakdowns because at the end of the day we’re going to be more protectionist. The taking away of the Timaru gas boom because of emission concerns. And speaking of emissions, there are all the penalties that this government is more prepared to pay than the last one.

None of this is necessarily wrong, but I think it is prudent to say, particularly to the poor, that things are going to get harder before they get better.

A lot worse. Especially if the housing market tanks. Most businesses in NZ are small business, supported by mortgages on houses which may well be heading for negative equity. The banks will move, houses will be sold, businesses will tank.

That’s always the price of transformative governments. As the physical trainers say: no pain, no gain.

The government won’t talk about the pain, only the gain, for obvious reasons. The opposition will hype the gain into some mythical monster. Look what they did to the elusive fiscal hole.

The truth is – like all things – in the middle

But I am just warning change doesn’t come cheap. I trust you’re aware of it and up for it.

They won’t be up for it, except this time it won’t be evil baby-eating tory scum hurting them…it will be Labour, the sort of Labour like David Lange and Roger Douglas brought in….but without any of the gains they delivered to us.

But that’s ok we all have Jacinda’s concern face to fall back on.

Labour take credit for low unemployment mere weeks into the job

Minister of Employment Willie Jackson has today welcomed the release of the Household Labour Force Survey, which shows unemployment falling to 4.6 per cent.

“It’s good to see the rate of unemployment continue to trend down, but with 126,000 people unemployed in New Zealand, we can do better,” says Mr Jackson.

“However, the high level of unemployment for Maori and Pacific Peoples is completely unacceptable. It is currently around three times higher than that of New Zealand Europeans, and this must improve.

“Because they dont want to work due to WINZ being

a life style for them”.

“I will be talking to all the relevant organisations, such as Business New Zealand, Unions and Iwi, over the next few weeks. Partnering with them will be a key component in shaping a forward focused employment policy which improves outcomes for all New Zealanders.

“One of this Government’s other priorities is higher wages for all New Zealanders and it’s great to see wages lifting due to the recent care and support worker pay equity settlement.

“This shows that by working hard to create pay equality for women, we will raise New Zealand’s wages and living conditions. I’m looking forward to seeing more progress made in this area,” says Willie Jackson.

Sadly, for those to become unemployed, nothing that Labour has done so far had time to influence the unemployment rate.   And I think we should take the opportunity to bookmark this article as it is likely to be the lowest rate we’ll see under this Labour government.

Anecdotal evidence exists already that companies have paused their plans until they can see what this government is going to be doing.  The knock-on effect will make Minister Jackson look like the least competent of them all.   His numbers will continue to tank.

Hang on.  They’re going to change the way they measure unemployment.  Sigh.

Labour continue to destroy rather than create: Three Strikes to go

Labour’s credentials as a crime-loving party are in safe hands:

The three strikes law is “silly”, doesn’t work, and will be dismantled next year, Justice Minister Andrew Little says.

“It’s been on the statute books for eight years now,” Little told the Herald. “Our serious offending rate is rising, our prison population is rising. Throwing people into prison for longer and longer just isn’t working.”

However, repealing it was not in the Government’s 100-day plan.

“It will be some time next year, I imagine. It’s a silly law anyway, but I want to make sure when we do get rid of it, we can say, ‘Here is our plan to reduce serious offending rates’.”

The three strikes law was passed in 2010 and applies to 40 serious sexual or violent offences.

The first-strike conviction results in a normal sentence and a warning, the second in a sentence without parole and a final warning, and the third in the maximum sentence for that offence without parole – though parole eligibility can be granted if a judge deems the sentence manifestly unjust.

The latest Ministry of Justice figures up to July 2017 show that 8503 offenders were on a first warning, 216 were on a final warning, and two have been convicted of a third strike.

216 get a free pass, and 8,503 now have no further incentive not to be braindead idiots and do it again.

As you can see by the numbers, the law is working very well as a deterrent.

This is just spite.   They will destroy Three Strikes.  They will destroy Charter Schools.  ACT’s nine years will have come to nothing at all.

The nasty party are back.   And they can’t wait to break things.