This is so damn funny đ pic.twitter.com/P1CB8FXdQF
— The Golden Age is coming đ¸ (@PatriotNz2022) September 24, 2022
Category Archives: General
Ref was right
The things the Racist Maori dont want you to know
RIP
Well well well LOL
Wear a giant TikiâŚ
Get a mokoâŚ
Dye your hair blackâŚ
Bit of fake tan to hide frecklesâŚ
Add a Maori name to your surnameâŚ
Aaaand POW!
Iâm a Maori!Â
Apartheid NZ, more international embarrassment
New Zealandâs mainstream media has finally named the elephant in the room. Late last month, the nationâs biggest newspaper, the New Zealand Herald, published an opinion piece that claimed a coup is under way in New Zealand by the Maori tribal elite.
The article, written by former Labour minister and ACT Party leader Richard Prebble, was widely circulated and commented on, including by the state broadcaster RadioNZ.
His column focused mainly on the governmentâs plan to confiscate the water assets of the nationâs 67 councils and hand their governance to an equal number of unelected tribal members and council representatives.
The deeply unpopular asset-confiscation program is known as Three Waters â drinking water, stormwater, and wastewater.
The headline of Prebbleâs read, Three Waters is a coup â an attack on democracy.
Unfortunately for the government â and Nanaia Mahuta, the Minister of Local Government who is driving the legislative change â the former Ministerâs views cannot be easily dismissed. As an influential member of Cabinet during the revolutionary Labour government led by David Lange in the mid-80s, he has a unique political insight and his views carry weight.
Prebble noted that New Zealand is a âliberal democracyâ in which âindividual rights and freedoms are officially recognised and protected ⌠by the rule of lawâ. Governments, he said, are therefore âaccountable to the people by a system of one person, one voteâ.
âLiberal democracy is incompatible with co-government by tribes,â he concluded.
While he believes there may be some logic to the use of co-governance as a pragmatic solution to historic claims for the ownership of disputed public assets such as national parks, there is none for public services such as Three Waters:
âIt is ratepayers â Maori and non-Maori â who paid for the pipes, dams, stormwater drains, and sewage plants. The Governmentâs Three Waters legislation is a coup. It is replacing liberal democracy with co-government with iwi.â
Another voice that cannot be easily dismissed is that of Kaipara Mayor Dr Jason Smith, who was appointed by Minister Mahuta as a member of a working group established to mollify opponents of the reforms. He described Three Waters as âa Trojan Horse for ending democratic rightsâ.
The iwi elite driving the takeover are seeking comprehensive tribal rule by 2040. The plan to achieve this goal is outlined in a radical document called He Puapua, which was mapped out by the government in 2019, under the guise of enacting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
The declaration was signed secretly in 2010 under the conservative National government of John Key, who assured the nation it was ânon-bindingâ and had largely symbolic significance.
Knowing how explosive He Puapua was, Jacinda Ardern barely mentioned it in Labourâs 2020 campaign manifesto. Even her Deputy Prime Minister, Winston Peters, knew nothing about it before the election. It was only revealed after Ardern won a landslide victory.
By failing to gain the consent of voters for what looks like tribal rule (as they were never asked), Jacinda Ardern has no mandate for He Puapua co-governance agenda. It is completely illegitimate.
The governmentâs Office for Maori Crown Relations clarifies on its website where this tribal âpartnershipâ agenda is leading:
âMaori decide and the Crown assists in implementing the decision made by Maori. The Crownâs role is as enabler and implementer, not a decision-maker.â
Hiding in plain sight, the website confirms for anyone still uncertain about the extent of the coup currently underway that the ultimate goal of the so-called âco-governanceâ partnership agenda is, indeed, tribal rule.
As a result, the Prime Minister is embedding racial preference throughout our regulatory and legislative framework â from the Public Service and the conservation estate to schools and the entire science and research sector.
Enabling iwi to control health required new legislation to abolish the countryâs 20 district health boards just as giving them control of water involves a bill to confiscate water infrastructure and services from all 67 councils.
That piece of legislation, the Water Services Entities Bill, passed its first reading in June with more than 88,000 public submissions lodged â most in opposition. Showing a deep disdain for democratic convention, the government is refusing to hear from most of the thousands of submitters who asked to be heard in person.
The scale and speed of the governmentâs cultural takeover is breathtaking, and it is reshaping democracy as we know it before our very eyes.
Professor Elizabeth Rata, the Director of Knowledge in Education at Auckland University, outlined the threat posed by this tribal coup in a recent address entitled In Defence of Democracy.
âI want to talk about democracy â about what it is we are in danger of losing and what we need to do to retain our nationâs remarkable 170-year legacy of democratic governanceâŚ
âThe question we must ask is this: How has a small group of individuals, both Maori and non-Maori, managed to install a racialised ideology into our democracy?
âThe corporate tribes have already acquired considerable governance entitlements â the next and final step is tribal sovereignty. It is a coup dâetat in all but name, accomplished not by force but by ideology â enabled by a compliant media.â
And thatâs the point.
The Prime Minister is using a well-orchestrated public media campaign to justify the transfer of control of major public resources and services from the Crown and thus, out of the hands of the people.
Using a $55 million Public Interest Journalism Fund, thatâs only available to media who agree to âacknowledgeâ and âpromoteâ the fabrication that underpins co-governance â that Maori are Treaty âpartnersâ with the Crown â without the full scrutiny of New Zealandâs Fourth Estate, this tribal coup is being progressed at pace.
Dr Muriel Newman is a former New Zealand Member of Parliament, who runs the public policy think tank the New Zealand Centre for Political Research at www.nzcpr.com
LOL.
The fight for New Zealand is now underway
In spite of government opposition, a radical report proposing destroying New Zealandâs democracy, unintelligibly called He Puapua (letâs not give it an English title, or people may begin to wonder what is in it) has been released, because of an appeal under the Official Information Act (OIA). A previous, heavily redacted version was finally released but only as a result of constant pressure.
He Puapua argues for this country to be predominantly governed by individuals of part-Maori ancestry and for those of part-Maori descent â no matter how minimal. A separate parliament and civil service is to govern those identifying as Maori, with, as usual, no definition of who can legitimately be regarded as Maori â in a country where intermarriage has been the norm for 200 years â and where full-blooded Maoris no longer exist.
Its intent is for separate Maori health and court systems; Maori ownership of the foreshore and seabed (now already happening); separate Maori wards on councils; Maori governance over water and every other possible sphere of influence â such as the reassignment of the entire conservation estate under the Department of Conservation (DOC).
This two-systems approach has already been adopted, with health reforms dominated by a separate Maori Health Authority able to veto government decisions relating to everybodyâs health. Under Jacinda Ardernâs supervision, Labour has already pushed legislation through parliament to ensure the public no longer has a say with regard to Maori wards on councils. Moreover, it is envisaged that progress between basically two governments would be overseen by the Aotearoa Monitoring Group, currently chaired by the Maori sovereignty activist, Margaret Mutu. Larded with increasing numbers of untranslated Maori words and phrases â making it virtually impossible for most New Zealanders to understand â it has been well described as âa masterpiece of deceitâ. No reference is made to the fact that a previous Independent Constitutional Review Panel examining radicalised Maorisâ call for a Treaty-based constitution found widespread opposition to the proposal, with 96 per cent of submissions opposing it, âand 97 per cent vehemently opposed to local government Maori seatsâ.
Incredibly, some former politicians are simply shaking their heads at Jacindaâs supposed ânaĂŻvetĂŠâ. This manipulative politician, adept at projecting compassion and well-being, flashing her famous smiles, and talking at great length âwhile managing to say almost nothing relevant in response to questioning â is dodging accountability by switching to vigorous and indignant Hollywooding, claiming she hasnât read the document.
Who actually believes her, given that while she claims the report hasnât found its way to the Cabinet table, and refuses to state her view on its recommendations, her ministers are already implementing some of its communications? Her current ploy is to brush off criticism of this pernicious, fundamentally racist document by accusing its critics of âplaying politicsâ. So much for her promise of transparent government.
As historian Mike Butler has pointed out, the plan to implement He Puapua was slipped in under the radar, without troubling MPs or talking to the media. That Labour did not campaign on this in either the 2017 or 2020 elections invites the charge of sheer duplicity.
What we are being now faced with is apparently prevarication on a grand scale â from the same determined woman who has consistently handed over every possible advantage, with preferential taxpayer funding, to perennially obsessed part-Maori agitators.
This same adroit politician appointed the controversial Nania Mahuta to crucial portfolios imposing thoroughly undemocratic directions. Mahuta could not possibly have done so without Jacindaâs backing. And if the Prime Ministerâs hand is being forced here, who is the puppeteer? To whom does she owe allegiance?
While she has described herself as socialist, in fact socialism is regarded as the smokescreen of communism â to tactically present a more palatable face to the public. Moreover, destabilising a democracy is regarded as a communist coup.
We should be under no illusions. This attack on this country is well under way, as is the Maori sovereignty takeover, assisted by a Prime Minister so foolishly dismissed as merely naive, but who, on the actual evidence â her ongoing promotion of divisiveness and separatism â is bad news for New Zealanders and undermining national unity.
What about government-related official institutions embracing the ridiculous? To simply laugh off what is happening would be a big mistake in relation to the nonsense recently produced by Christian Hawkesby, assistant-governor of the Reserve Bank, now to be known as Te Putea, no doubt to bring it into line with what pre-European Maoris used to call it before their colonist oppressors arrived.
Hawkesbyâs recent address to the Institute of Directors centred around the claim that Tane, the God of the Forest, watches over all bank employees. âEach day as we walk through the security gates to enter our Wellington offices, Tane Mahuta (New Zealandâs oldest living Kauri tree) âlooks back at us as a reminder of our responsibility⌠which is to ensure that âTane will not wilt and lose manaâ.â And so on.
Could we ever have envisaged such nonsense â a Reserve Bank official calling on his staff to worship a giant tree to make sure it doesnât wilt? Itâs been pointed out that, âMr Hawkesby is responsible for formulating monetary policy, providing equity in financial markets, managing the foreign reserves, operating interbank payment and settlement systems, and circulation of currencyâ.
It is not his job, if undertaking a personal journey into the psychobabble of animism, to inflict what many regard as less than rational thinking on bank employees. He should be required to resign. Simply calling what he said ridiculous is only a start. His New Age nonsense and arguably racist activism is conduct unbecoming â not only unacceptable â but with no place in government.
And yet this primitive underpinning of what should be rational advocacies is becoming increasingly pervasive â as with activistsâ success in opposing specific project developments because of the claimed presence of taniwhas (mythical Maori monsters).
With New Zealandâs democracy now white-anted by racist policies, we will also deservedly become a laughing stock if our politicians and bureaucrats continue to pay obeisance to primitivism. However, as Einstein observed, âOnly two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and Iâm not sure about the former.â