Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says there will still be a Government building programme at the next election but she was not able to guarantee that KiwiBuild would be part of it.
KiwiBuild, the Government’s policy to build affordable homes for first-home buyers, is under severe strain after Housing Minister Phil Twyford admitted the Government would fall woefully short of its first year target of 1000 homes by July 1.
It is currently under an extended review and the minister was absent from a KiwiBuild-focused conference in Auckland on Monday, as he had to attend Cabinet.
TOM LEE/STUFF
“We still will have a Government build programme, the rest I’ll leave to the reset,” Ardern said.
Ardern was asked repeatedly by media at her post-Cabinet press conference if KiwiBuild would again be Labour policy at the 2020 election, as it was in the 2014 and 2017 elections.
She declined to directly say that, instead guaranteeing that a Government build programme would remain, but leaving any further detail to be announced at the long-expected “reset” of the policy.
“We still will have a Government build programme, the rest I’ll leave to the reset,” Ardern said.
“We’re working on the reset, when we’ve got an announcement to make we’ll make it.
“We are not lessening the focus we have on rectifying what is ultimately a crisis in our housing sector.”
The lack of guarantee echoed a similar issue in recent months when Ardern and Twyford found themselves unable to guarantee the policy would still see 100,000 homes built.
Ardern said the Government was not giving up on housing and expressed confidence in Twyford as minister.
“He has done an incredible job. It’s an very difficult area of policy. No Government has had to do this before or has tried to do this before. And It’s not been easy. But as as a result we are building more than any Government has since the 1970s. I’m proud of that: It’s extended across transitional housing, Housing NZ, public housing spaces, and homelessness, and that’s thanks to Phil Twyford.”
Housing NZ’s build programme has increased rapidly in recent years, increasing by nine-fold between 2016 and 2019.
It’s understood there is frustration in the Beehive that the failure in KiwiBuild has polluted the public image around the rest of the housing portfolio.
A spokeswoman for Twyford declined to comment on the Prime Minister’s remarks.
Ardern said Twyford had brought a paper to Cabinet on Monday – hence his lack of appearance at the KiwiBuild conference – but it was not the “reset” paper.
The programme has been beset with issues ever since its establishment.
The head of the unit Stephen Barclay resigned in January following a bitter employment dispute with the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, who took over responsibility for the unit after it was transferred from the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment.
The unit’s first year target of 1000 homes by July 2019 is set to be massively undershot missed with just 122 homes complete and 477 under construction.
OPINION: About the Beehive, the swagger of some Government MPs has shifted.
Under-siege Housing Minister Phil Twyford has retreated from public interviews on the policy quickly becoming his Waterloo.
Happy to talk about transport, his shoulders hunch and his chin drops a few degrees to cut a visibly downcast figure whenever the K-word is brought up.
Meanwhile, backbenchers and lower-tiered ministers expecting promotion are positively suppressing urges to skip down the hallways.
Nothing like the threat of a reshuffle to make ministers question their performance.
Some of them well might. Although the increasing trend to duck for cover behind the human cannon fodder officials are providing as an added service might have lulled a few into a false sense of security.
ROBERT KITCHIN/STUFF
Cabinet tables rarely finish the term in the same state they started. PM Jacinda Ardern and Winston Peters are front and centre during the first cabinet meeting of the new Labour/NZ First government.
Much has been made about the level of competence Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has to work with in the Cabinet ranks.
A string of recent political controversies seem to point to a common response: “We were acting on the best advice of officials”.
That might have paid off for a few, having escaped scandal with only flesh wounds to lick. But it’s a problematic approach and one day a minister will have their head lopped off for it.
So here’s a basic lesson on the mechanics of government.
Government sets the policy, and government departments enact the policy.
But it’s the Government’s political policy.
Ministers have to do their homework first because some officials may be boffins, but they’re not miracle workers.
BRADEN FASTIER/STUFF
Housing Minister Phil Twyford has retreated from public interviews on Kiwibuild.
KiwiBuild is an unmitigated disaster. Dreamed up by Annette King in the back seat of a car, she latched on to it and set the original target of 50,000 houses because it sounded good in her head. A wish-list, not a policy.
Legend has it the close breathing of David Cunliffe down David Shearer’s neck was precisely what prompted the last-minute decision to blurt out 100,000 homes on the day of the announcement.
And here sits Twyford. He is the man responsible, because if officials start telling him he’ll need to build the equivalent of two Hamiltons, the red flag should have been raised and the question asked: Is this actually possible?
Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway might now apply more scrutiny to his own decisions, having made a spectacularly wrong call in initially allowing convicted passport fraudster, drug smuggler and known gang associate Karel Sroubek to stay in the country following his prison stint for those crimes.
CHRIS SKELTON/STUFF
Has David Clark’s management of what has so far been relatively light scrutiny of the health system since his tenure began, been up to the snuff of the Prime Minister? Health is showing all the signs of becoming a bigger liability than normal, as DHBs scream into the red.
The advice from officials at the outset may have been found wanting. But the political risk is obvious and it’s another example of a minister asking next to no questions of his officials as to the credibility of Sroubek’s claim (again, convicted of dishonesty charges) he would be killed on his return.
Had Finance Minister Grant Robertson simply asked his Treasury Secretary how he knew his department had been hacked, he may not have prevented Gabriel Makhlouf from knowingly making an incorrect public statement about the leak of Budget documents, but he may have gleaned enough to know the folly of sending out his own matcher.
Most recently, Health Minister David Clark said he was acting on the best advice of medical officials when it was revealed he had no clue there was another 30,000 meningitis vaccines waiting in the wings for purchase that could have ensured every adolescent could be immunised against an outbreak.
He was advised early on there was a cache we had access to, but asked no questions as to whether it was better to vaccinate all children in an infected area, rather than ration the response.
Clark is on surer footing here – the response, as designed by officials, worked and it was in line with international vaccine campaigns.
WARWICK SMITH/STUFF
A man with his thinking face. Did he wear the same expression before granting Karel Sroubek residency in less than an hour?
But political pressure was valid, when questioning whether the lives of some children were needlessly put at risk. His failure to ask for further vaccine details didn’t inoculate him from responsibility when it comes to the politics of health.
Politics is not the job of the neutral public service – that’s the role of the politician.
If a minister is not across their portfolio enough to ask the right questions of officials, then scandal will likely not be far behind. If a minister doesn’t appear to have the political radar to spot political risk then they become the risk.
Sir John Key made a rare return to news headlines this week, sacking his ANZ chief executive David Hisco for his mischaracterisation of spending company funds.
It was a reminder of his complete zero tolerance approach of anyone who made him look bad. He knew he had a finite amount of political capital and he wasn’t prepared to spend any on anyone who wasn’t worth it.
ROSA WOODS/STUFF
With some ministers proving to be a pain in the neck, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has some tough decisions before what is shaping as a likely Thursday Cabinet reshuffle announcement.
Where Ardern dragged her heels in forcing out ministerial flops Clare Curran and Meka Whaitiri, Key was clinical in his removal of dead weight.
Phil Heatley and Kate Wilkinson can attest to the insult of being ousted for simply failing to deliver. It’s understood Heatley’s crime was showing up to Cabinet four times in a row with a paper full of gaping holes and not remotely up to snuff.
While that was never the problem with Judith Collins, her demise proved no-one was irreplaceable.
It might seem cold, callous even, but New Zealanders do also have a right to expect a high performance from the people they appoint to the highest offices.
Arguably, it forced competence where newbie ministers understood the standard early on and those waiting on the sidelines knew to pull their socks up before stepping on the field.
All Blacks coach Steve Hansen’s “next man up” mentality might be a more palatable example for some Ministers. Every New Zealander knows there’s no going easy on a player who lets the side down, even if they’re the second-stringer.
Blaming mistakes on the rest of the team doesn’t tend to foster trust with the ball.
Much the same way, claiming “the public servants made me do it” doesn’t exactly instil confidence a minister is on top of their portfolio
Ex-political reporter Patrick Gower has been let down by the Coalition government which has not delivered all the change it had promised and that he had predicted they would deliver.
Former Newshub political editor Patrick Gower has revealed the worst call he has ever made in his career.
On October 19, 2017, New Zealand First leader Winston Peters announced, as the election’s king-maker, that he would form a Government with Labour – ending National’s nine years in power.
Peters said keeping National on top would have meant a “modified status quo” versus creating “change” with Labour, who would give capitalism back “its human face”.
Gower, Newshub’s political editor at the time, said the new Government could be summed up with one word: “Change”.
“Change – complete change. The new Government will totally change New Zealand’s politics and its economy,” Gower wrote in an opinion piece.
But Gower, who admitted he was “excited and hopeful” at the time, has now revealed that that call was the “worst” he has ever made.
[…] “I apologise to everyone who saw it and read it, because we see it is patently not true.”
Gower then goes on to list the promised changes that never eventuated.
Drastic immigration cut by up to 30,000,
The government building 100,000 homes
Foreign buyers being banned from obtaining homes and farms
What New Zealand got instead, immigration-wise, was a net gain of 70,700 compared to October 2016. As for building 100,000 homes, so far the grand total is only 119 which is 881 short of the promised 1000 homes meant to have been built by July 1st.
A capital gains tax was also ruled out – something supporters of the Government believed would dramatically change New Zealand’s tax system.
The Labour-led coalition government has amassed an impressively long list of failures and scandals, considering the length of time they have been in power.
Failures and scandals
The Sroubek drug dealer deportation affair
The appointment of the speaker on dayone
Airforce $1B purchase of Hercules with no tender
$10 visits to the Doctor
Twyford and Parker meet with Goff in a ‘secret meeting’
Jenny Marcroft’s attempt to bully Mark Mitchell
Shane Jones’s conflict of interest in the far North
Kermadec marine sanctuary
A lobbyist in the PM’s office who does not declare his clients
We say on this blog all the time, that this government would be in a lot more trouble if it did not have a very compliant media. Most of the media in this country let the government off the hook: from the Young Labour camp scandal to the Karel Sroubek case, the Derek Handley fiasco to more recently the biased speaker. Then there was the Treasury hack that wasn’t, and Trevor Mallard claiming that a parliamentary staffer was a rapist when all he did was give a colleague a hug.
Staffers, ministers and the speaker himself would have fallen on their swords – with a little assistance – under the last government, but now there is no accountability. We simply do not have the media baying for blood at each transgression like we did with the last government.
Well, maybe the worm is starting to turn. Duncan Garner has attacked the government, saying that this is the least effective government for the last 25 years.
I won’t argue with that.
Remember when Labour promised to lower the number of immigrants coming into the country?
The message to cut immigration numbers sat alongside other grandiose brain dribbles that would never happen. I recall 100,000 homes to be built, world-class cancer treatment centres, and a halving of the 70,000 immigrants that enter NZ every year.
But, the truth is, Labour told you a bunch of utter garbage, they told you what you wanted to hear – dog whistle politics to keep up with Winston Peters. But the truth is they have done diddly squat to get there.
We are back to rubber stamping immigrants into New Zealand to take the jobs in construction or whatever it is that they do and frankly, that we need.
There were 55,000 new immigrants to the year ending April 2019. We need these people, clearly.
Maybe, or maybe not, but we have nowhere for them to live, of course. Whether these immigrants are in the skilled migrant category or not, they are still not going to make the housing crisis any better.
Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway’s ideas to cut immigration can fit on the world’s smallest post-it note. In other words, he’s still hiding under his desk from the last debacle, scared to come out in case the PM is reminded how utterly useless he is.
I doubt if he has to worry too much. There is a cabinet reshuffle on the horizon, but as the talent pool for this government is as shallow as the proverbial car park puddle, I doubt if there is anyone better. That is the really sad thing in all of this.
When it comes to immigration, expect nothing to be done until Winston and his mates enter the next election period.
I am really not sure that Winston will get away with this again. He has raged on about immigration for decades, but for most of that time, he has either been in opposition, or a junior coalition partner. This time, he is the deputy prime minister and is clearly pulling a lot of strings. That he has not stemmed the flow of immigrants, while not significantly increasing the number of skilled migrants, is something he may have to address in the next campaign.
Duncan Garner is scathing. Here is how he sums up the efforts so far of this ‘transformational government’.
I’ve watched politics closely for 25 years and this government is the least effective of them all, by some margin.
Newshub.
Totally agree, Duncan. And it is not only in immigration that they are failing.
I have been intending to write an article about the speaker this week, mainly because everything seems to have gone quiet on his accusations of rape against a parliamentary staffer. It both amazes and frightens me the way no one in this government ever seems to be held to account, even in cases where lives are damaged or destroyed.
You will all remember the Young Labour camp last year where there were accusations of actual sexual assault. No one was held to account for that, and the perpetrator still has the shield of anonymity. There is also anonymity in this case; Mallard accused an unnamed man of rape when it turns out that all he was guilty of was an apparently unwanted hug.
I am writing about this because no one in the media seems to be doing so… even though Barry Soper interviewed the man in question and clearly had some sympathy for him. Let’s recap what Soper said at the time.
The man stood down from Parliament after Trevor Mallard’s claims about rape says he feels bullied out of the building and wants an apology for what he described as the Speaker’s “slanderous” comments.
They are slanderous all right, and totally unjustified. I can only assume Mallard got the wrong end of the stick here and sympathised with the complainant, even though he was not in possession of the full facts. To claim a hug is rape though is off the planet. No one can ever hug anyone again without risking being subjected to a similar claim. This is the world we live in now.
He was stood down after the publication of last week’s Francis report into bullying and harassment in the Beehive, which revealed three serious allegations of sexual harassment.
Shortly afterward, Mallard said these alleged incidents were tantamount to rape.
Tantmount? Rape is rape. It requires penetration. The only question that arises with rape is about consent. A hug is not rape. A hug is a hug.
The hug may have been unwelcome, and to be fair, we all find ourselves in situations where we don’t particularly want to receive a hug, but you accept it with good grace and move on with your life.
Ardern refused to comment on the nature of the allegations in the Francis report. All information given to the Francis report was anonymous, she said.
A Newspaper.
Herein lies the problem. I understand that some people may want anonymity if they are making accusations against a dangerous person likely to retaliate in some way, although such anonymity is not generally given in the court system. There is a reason for that. The problem with anonymity in cases like this is that anyone can accuse anyone of anything, safe in the knowledge that they will never be held to account for what they have said. That can be dangerous.
I would bet my bottom dollar that, if there had not been a guarantee of anonymity in the enquiry into bullying at parliament, the ‘rape’ accusation would never have been made. Not that we actually know that the complainant made any such claim. We only know that Trevor Mallard did.
Well, for me, if a complainant is going to make an accusation against someone that could ruin his or her life, they had better be prepared to front up. If they are not, then questions must be asked about the motives of the complainant. In some cases, the motives will be malicious, without due cause. That might be what we have here.
I have a lot of sympathy with women who are genuine victims of sexual attacks, but an unwanted hug does not fit into that category. Yet this is the world we live in now. It may have been well intended originally, but the #metoo movement really does have a lot to answer for.
Ardern’s government budget has given a $25 million dollar funding boost to stop boats full of refugees from landing in New Zealand. This is embarassing for her as she wants to be seen as the kind and compassionate face of New Zealand welcoming refugees in to enjoy our ‘free’ housing, welfare and education.
Indeed she has made quite a big deal about it, complaining that our Australian cousins are refusing to send to us their unwanted illegal migrants on Manus Island. Actions, however, speak louder than words, and Ardern no doubt hoped that the funding boost to stop the boats would go unnoticed.
[…] Efforts to prevent boats of asylum seekers heading to New Zealand received $25 million funding boost in Budget 2019.
The heat has been on New Zealand from the other side of the Tasman for years.
[…] People smuggling was put back in the spotlight last year when intelligence leaks from across the ditch claimed there were new boat arrivals of asylum seekers, blaming Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern. This was followed by a public spat between Justice Minister Andrew Little and Australian Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton, over New Zealand’s contributions to the region’s security.
It seems Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern have not been not on the same page about how much of a threat people smuggling poses. Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway said the extra funding to prevent people smuggling would be used to boost New Zealand intelligence at home and offshore in the Asia Pacific region.
After the Budget announcement on Thursday, Lees-Galloway told reporters the risk of smuggling had increased in recent years but not long after, Ardern told reporters, no greater risk of asylum seeker boats travelling to New Zealand had been identified.
[…] The extra funding would be used to boost New Zealand intelligence at home and offshore in the Asia Pacific region. It would be used to invest spy technology to monitor chatter.
Less-Galloway […] insisted […] “There has been absolutely no pressure from the Australian Government. This has been a decision that New Zealand has made because we are aware that we are a target for people smugglers… and we are aware this dangerous journey puts lives at risk.”
[…] No boat had ever made it to New Zealand because it was a dangerous trip – but there had been chatter suggesting people smugglers were targeting and touting New Zealand as a potential destination […]
It was important for New Zealand to remain vigilant and have the appropriate resources to prevent and manage the possibility of a maritime mass arrival, he said.
[…] the move was criticised by Greens co-leader James Shaw, who objected to the spend.
National’s immigration spokesman Michael Woodhouse said […]
It was a significant change in policy for the Labour party that once told him there was more chance of little green men from Mars, than boat people coming to New Zealand, he said.
“They are on record saying it [boat people] was dog whistling and a beat up. Now they are spending-up on preventing boats arriving. If there is no change in the chatter, why is there a change in the investment in our border controls and our intelligence gathering?”
The lack of rental accommodation is reaching a crisis point. This government has driven so many landlords out of the market that there is nowhere to rent. I have heard stories about 70 people turning up every time a rental becomes available in Blenheim, and there are similar stories told in Lower Hutt. Tauranga has recently reached a particular crisis point, where there is simply nowhere to go.
Did you hear that, Jacinda?
The ‘No Vacancy’ sign has been put up in Tauranga.
The median weekly rent in the city hit a record $525 this April – that’s around three-quarters of the median income.
Property managers there estimate the city is short around 1000 rental properties, and the ones that are there are skyrocketing in price.
Trade Me’s statistics reflect a classic supply and demand issue. In March, listings were down 13 percent and enquiries soared by 75 percent. In April they were down 24 percent while enquiries were up 44 percent.
Tauranga does have plenty of jobs though, thanks to the orchard industry and the ever-expanding port. But Mayor Greg Brownless has a warning: don’t move to his city, regardless of what the job is, unless you’ve got a home locked in. Because this is an issue no longer affecting only low socio-economic families, but everyone.
Even people with good incomes and good references cannot find rental accommodation in Tauranga. There are simply no houses available to rent.
Carrie Matkovich’s landlord was among those to move from Auckland to Tauranga. That left her without a home and forced her back into the rental rat race.
“I went to 103 viewings in 31 days,” she says.
The home she finally secured is $200 over her budget and meant moving her children to a new school. It’s a common consequence of the rental crunch.
The quantity and quality of applicants mean even the perfect prospective tenant is missing out.
“I’ve had a mum ring me last week, two kids, she works, good income, good job, good references, and she’ll be moving into a car next week if she doesn’t find a house,” says property manager Genna Short. Short says landlords are so spoilt for choice they can be extremely picky. Some are requesting not only ‘no pets’, but ‘no children’ either.
Is this how we solve child poverty, Jacinda? Rental properties that do not allow children?
Seeing that Phil Twyford’s latest proposal for tenants is that they should be allowed pets, regardless of what the landlord thinks, this is an interesting development. Do you think the government will stop being silly about this now, and stop driving landlords out of the rental market?
No, They won’t. Here is their solution.
Motels are increasingly being used as emergency accommodation for the homeless and now the Government is looking at buying more around the country, in areas like Hawke’s Bay, Northland, Wellington and Marlborough.
Not Tauranga. But then, Tauranga motel owners probably get plenty of tourists, and can be much more choosy about who they rent their units out to.
A South Auckland block of units is one of seven former motels the Government – both past and present – has bought for a total of more than $14 million dollars spread around the country.
The Government buys the sites and then pays community organisations like the Monte Cecilia Trust to manage them and provide services to those in need.
“The success is measured in families not having to live in cars, leaky garages or on park benches,” Monte Cecelia Trust’s Bernie Smith told 1 NEWS.
This may be better than sleeping under a bridge, but it is no long term solution. If the Tauranga situation is anything to go by, some of these people will be in motels for months, if not years.
We all know what motels are like. The units are mostly very small, and even the more spacious units are scant accommodation for more than a night or two. I stayed in a motel in Taupo last year where I had to hold back the kitchen door to open the fridge. Living like that will drive people crazy fairly fast, particularly if they have children.
There are more than 11,000 people on the state housing waiting list and just under 2700 were placed in transitional housing in the last quarter.
The Government agrees that transitional housing has been an effective method but there are big concerns about increasing use of commercial motels for emergency accommodation.
“My preference would absolutely be that we did not have people in motels, but if the alternative is that they are in their cars, or sleeping rough, or no accommodation at all, it is much better than the alternative,” Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said.
The alternative, Jacinda, was 10,000 new houses built every year for 10 years, as your government promised. Apparently, 18 months in, you have just broken the 100 mark, with 102 houses now completed. Wow. Only 99,898 to go… in 8.5 years.
Buying motels was never on the agenda.
I guess you could argue that this move makes sense. It is better to own motels rather than paying a small fortune every month paying motel owners to accommodate people, but it is hardly an ideal solution. This is, in fact, the government admitting defeat on the housing issue when, if anyone could solve it, they could.
In the meantime, some motel owners are laughing all the way to the bank. Motels are not the favoured holiday accommodation any more, particularly since the advent of AirBnB. Who would have thought that the government would come to the rescue of failing motel owners? It warms the cockles of my heart.
Just make sure you steer clear of these places, though, if you are looking for a place to stay. It pays not to go near them.
The evidence is absolutely damning and a slam dunk, and still Ardern equivocates about it all. If she is this much of an equivocator over a case that is so open and shut it is scary to think what she would be like dealing with a really serious crisis.
The situation is clear cut yet it appears to be quite a conundrum for the prime minister, as Treasury Secretary Gabriel Makhlouf is after all one of the main architects of the Labour party’s “wellbeing” budget. Throwing him under a bus will feel like a betrayal of sorts, but why he was back at work yesterday as if everything was fine is beyond me.
The advice was found wanting, but the prime minister is reserving her judgmentover what to do with Treasury Secretary Gabriel Makhlouf until the State Services Commission has finished an investigation into the handling of last week’s Budget “leak”.
Speaking with Stuff on Tuesday, Jacinda Ardern would not be drawn on whether Makhlouf’s head was on the chopping block, after it appeared he misinformed both her office and Finance Minister Grant Robertson’s office that Treasury had been the subject of a hack, when it hadn’t.
“I don’t want to make any rash judgments or statements, while the State Services Commission are still looking into what happened over the course of those few days,” Ardern said.
You have to ask what exactly it will take for Ardern to take action. Does she really think she can treat the situation the same way that she treated the sexual assault and underage drinking scandal at the Young Labour camp? Does she think if she stalls long enough it will all go away and the media will lose interest?
[…] Hughes later confirmed he was considering claims by National that Treasury and the Government were “sitting on a lie” for 36 hours before coming clean, but he did not go so far as to confirm it was the subject of an investigation.
The Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) has since responded to media questions to confirm it advised Treasury from the outset that it was not dealing with a hack.
The GCSB’s advice came before Treasury referred a potential hack to police, advised the minister’s office there had been a hack, and released a public statement saying the information had been received – directly or indirectly – as the result of a hack.
[…] It’s understood spy agencies were unaware the public statement on Tuesday evening would contain the word “hack” – Treasury having not consulted the GCSB before delivering its comment to media – which sent the intelligence community into a spin at thought a critical Government department may have been the subject of an offshore hack.
National took the step on Sunday of writing to Hughes to formally request the terms of his investigation be extended to include both Labour and Treasury’s communications in the aftermath of the incident […]
When the left-leaning media start putting the boot into our socialist government, things are getting serious. Did Heather wake up and have a sip of reality one morning?
Just like that, the rainbows and unicorns have vanished.
Where on earth did HPDA get that imagery from? It seems that her faith in a government that could be transformational, transparent and kind has been shattered as she says we have just witnessed one of the most brutal Budget weeks in living memory.
If ever there was a chance to transform, it was with the Wellbeing Budget. We were told it was a world-first. The OECD would be watching. It was “different”. It was promising “intergenerational change”.
That gets a ‘Fail’ from HPDA.
It was supposed to usher in a New and Amazing and Caring way of looking after our citizens. It sounded like a whoopee cushion instead.
This was supposed to be the most open and transparent government in the history of New Zealand. Jacinda Ardern told us that. […]
Another ‘Fail’ from HPDA.
Either Robertson knew what he was claiming [about criminal behaviour linked to the Opposition] wasn’t true, or he made an error so rookie it’s embarrassing. Either he played along with the hack claim to smear the Opposition, or he made a big mistake.
If it’s the former, it shreds the idea that this is the most open and transparent government in the history of the world. If it’s the latter, Robertson should tell Treasury Secretary Gabriel Makhlouf not to bother turning up to work on Tuesday after giving him wrong information.
And lastly, Heather asks, “Is this Government as kind as the PM keeps telling us it is?” and awards a third ‘Fail’.
What’s kind about Speaker Trevor Mallard accusing a man of rape when the real accusation against him was closer to a hug. An accusation that wasn’t even upheld.
It looks a lot like Mallard ran his mouth off about a rapist, freaked people out, realised he was in trouble for grossly exaggerating, and found a convenient way to put it to bed by announcing this guy was stood down from his job. That felt like scape-goating. It felt like Mallard put his job ahead of this man’s.
Is that kind? No. It’s not even living in the same city as kindness.
Heather is clearly not feeling the well-being.
This past week has shown us this Government is growing up. The awkward, pimply-faced, “I want to change the world” nonsense has vanished. The unicorns have been shot and eaten for dinner.
In the end, can you blame them? Politics doesn’t run on rainbow vapour. It’s brutal, ugly, cut-throat real politik.
Turns out this Government is getting pretty good at that kind of politics.
