Dancing with the racists

by Christie on May 30, 2018 at 1:30pm

Another day, another claim of racism against a Maori. This time, it was Marama Fox, who was voted off Dancing With the Stars in a dance-off elimination between her and former cricketer, Chris Harris.

That wasn’t the complaint, of course. The complaint is that she wasn’t the worst dancer; that there were poorer dancers than her, and that she shouldn’t have been voted off because she is a Maori.

Or something like that.

 

This from Tau Henare on Twitter, echoing a lot of similar sentiments about Marama’s efforts. Quote.

Fucken rigged, Seymour stays. Hashtag Racist that’s what it is, the white guy falls over f.f.s Seymour was worse. Hashtag Bullshit Hashtag D.W.T.S It’s worse than Hashtag Karius’ screw up End of quote.

Tau Henare should know better than this. The language, the claims of racism are all completely unbecoming of a former Minister.

So, I could claim he is being racist because he is picking on David Seymour. But, of course, it isn’t racism if it is levelled against a white guy. And do remember that if the other white guy, Chris Harris, had been voted off instead of Marama, then there would have been no complaint. This is why we will never move forward in this country until we stop having these stupid claims that everything is rigged against Maori.

For the record, here is what happens on these ‘reality TV’ shows.

The show is not about dancing. It is about ‘watchable’ TV. The intention is to provide surprises, shocks, tears, happy moments, sad moments. If it was entirely predictable, a lot of people would not watch or would give up fairly quickly. So, the outcomes have to be, at times, unexpected. That is what ‘reality TV’ is all about.

Remember, there is also a public voting element in this show too. It enables some vote rigging, even though that is not the way it is supposed to work. Maybe David Seymour has bigger public support than Marama Fox. Who knows? Does it really matter?

So, although there is a crew of competent dancers still left on the show, it always pays to keep a few duds on the go, so they can do unpredictable things. Remember Rodney Hide dropping his partner? That is the sort of thing they actually WANT on these shows. This is not ‘Come Dancing’ where genuinely skilful dancers compete against each other. This is reality TV. Let’s not take it all quite so seriously.

A good dancer will win the show, and everyone will be happy. But in the meantime, the show has to provide a few shocks along the way, to keep the audience interested. It is not white versus black. It is not male versus female. It is reality TV.

Just for the record, I DON’T watch this show. I caught the last 10 minutes of it and saw all the drama. Frankly, I thought Marama was average. She has a big personality and put on a good show, but her dancing is ordinary. I never thought that there would be a backlash of racism claims just because she was voted off. It was always going to happen at some point.

David Seymour won’t win it either. He’s being kept on at the moment for the extra entertainment that he might provide with some serious slip-ups, but he won’t last long. Soon, they will be at the business end of the tournament and will have to start at least pretending to care about the dancing.

But here we are. Another day, another claim of racism. Even where no racism exists.

Mike Hosking: Phil Twyford’s coming across as a knob

Poor old Phil Twyford had quite the week last week. He’s replacing Clare Curran as the minister most likely to get sacked.

In the early days, I was one of the few pointing out that the KiwiBuild program was a farce if not a fraud. The numbers didn’t add up, didn’t come close to adding up. Six months on, I am now one of many who sees this as the charade it was always was.

If you follow the story, you’ll find no shortage these days of commentary from those who have crunched the numbers, seen the shift in the promises, the change in the language, and have come to the inevitable conclusion that this is the policy that might ultimately bring the Government done.

Why? It’s their biggest promise, and it’s been run by a bloke who is a liability

Phone calls on planes goes to personality. It takes a type of person to conduct himself in that fashion, there is a flagrant arrogance about it, a disagreeable self-importance.

He damaged himself further by referring to the ‘kids’ in treasury. The same personality type applies to that level of condescension.

Neither of the offences leads to hanging, but they are a clue, a red flag. What treasury was saying is true; Twyford’s number have had the look of snake oil about them the whole time.

100,000 houses magicked up over 10 years using the same small pot of money over and over. The affordable figure isn’t even remotely affordable, and a figure that’s going up, making it even less affordable

The Government buying stakes in houses, using money they were going to build with because no one’s got the coin to buy them by themselves. No real acknowledgement that the construction sector’s overworked before Phil’s houses even get started, against a backdrop of a promise of 30,000 cut in immigration.

It’s been smokes and mirrors, a classic piece of political puffery dreamt up in an election campaign to fool the economically naive to think a  government can manipulate as large as housing markets with money they don’t have and labour they don’t have with prices they pulled out of a cornflakes packet. The Commerce Commission should be looking at it for fraud.

And the trouble with it all is apart from the fundamentals is the politic bit.  Policies need to be sold. Now, you can’t fault Phil for enthusiasm, but you can fault him for fact, for approach, for attitude, and it’s the attitude, the phone calls, the insults, the telling offs from the leader, that make a virtually impossible job even harder because he’s coming across as a knob.

And the Government can’t afford it’s biggest bit of work to be run a ruin by the sort of bloke who’s fast becoming the most disagreeable man in politics

If you do the work, you reap the rewards

by Cameron Slater on May 28, 2018 at 8:30am

Judith Collins is now registering in the preferred PM statistics. It should be expected, she’s about the only opposition MP actually doing the work that people expect from opposition MPs: Quote:

Prime Minister Judith Collins – how do those four words strung together make you feel? For 3.7 percent of New Zealanders, it feels pretty good.

Because for the first time ever, Ms Collins has registered in our Newshub-Reid Research poll as a candidate for preferred Prime Minister.   

If those four words made you shudder, fret not – Jacinda Ardern is still ranking stratospherically on 40.2 percent.

However, Ms Collins is ranking higher than Ms Ardern did when she first appeared as a preferred Prime Minister in 2015. Back then, Ms Ardern debuted at 3.5 percent.

Ms Collins insists she no longer harbours her extreme leadership ambitions of the past, and is “very happy doing what I’m doing and I’m very supportive of our leader Simon Bridges”.

“I’m not interested in rolling anyone or doing anything other than my job,” says Ms Collins.

But this is dire news for the actual leader of the National Party, Simon Bridges – his preferred Prime Minister ranking is just 9 percent.

That pales next to John Key and Bill English when they first took over as National leaders. Mr Key was on 24 percent and Mr English on 25 percent.

Mr Bridges says he isn’t fazed, telling Newshub “it’s early days – I’m just starting to get out and about”.

He is saved by the fact his party remains steady. If that starts to fall, he’s in trouble. End quote.

Judith is doing the work, and more importantly, she is taking scalps. That is how you go up in polls. Not swanning around visiting the provinces you neglected when in power.

How long before we see this pushed in NZ?

by Cameron Slater on May 27, 2018 at 10:30am

I’ve warned the food industry here for years, they’ve ignored me. But like night follows day the health wowsers never relent. They have followed the anti-tobacco playbook to the letter for fat, sugar, salt and anything else they want to control.

Now they are pushing for warning labels on food: Quote:

An image of a damaged human heart covered in yellowish fat from too much junk food would turn people off eating unhealthy fried chips and burgers, a study has found.

Health experts say it’s time for junk foods to carry graphic warnings like cigarette packets do, to combat the obesity epidemic.  

A University of Melbourne and Cancer Council Victoria study, published on Thursday, found the use of graphic warnings – like a decayed tooth or fatty heart – on unhealthy food was an effective tool in improving a person’s diet.

For the study, 95 hungry participants were shown colour pictures of 50 different snack foods ranging from chips, chocolate bars and biscuits to nuts, fruits and vegetables.

They were asked to rate on a scale how much they would like to eat each food at the end of the experiment.

Participants were then shown a number of different health warnings and asked to rate a similar set of 50 snack foods.

The research, published in the journal NeuroImage: Clinical and Appetite, found negative text combined with images was twice as effective at changing people’s choices than messages that had negative text-only content or those with images combined with positive text.

In addition, participants’ brain activity was monitored with electrodes attached to their heads.

This showed the warning labels prompted participants to exercise more self-control rather than act on impulse.

“The study shows that if you want to stop people choosing fatty and sugary packaged foods, health warnings actually work,” said study co-author, Dr Stefan Bode.

“It sheds light on the mechanisms in the brain that underlie the effects of health warning messages on food processing,” Dr Bode said.

Cancer Council Victoria behavioural researcher Dr Helen Dixon says the graphic images work because they “disrupt” the strong cues – like taste – that images of junk foods elicit.

This then allows a person to consciously consider the health implications of their food choices, she explained.

Obesity Policy Coalition executive director Jane Martin says the use of packaging should be used for good, not for bad.

“This research demonstrates that powerful, relevant information on food packaging can influence people and push them away from junk food,” said Ms Martin.

“Poor diets and being above a healthy weight are risk factors for heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer. To address this Australia needs a comprehensive strategy, which should consider improved labelling,” she said.

The public health advocates have called on the government to make the graphic labelling mandatory, as part of the revised Health Star Rating System. End quote.

I reckon a fat bastard tax would be more effective. These public health officials are the most miserable, conceited pricks I’ve ever had the displeasure of engaging with.

I bet their cupboards are stuffed with stale cruskits.

Mark my words, the public health lobbyists will be into this like a robbers dog.

All about Mac antivirus

Can Macs get viruses?

If you’re a Mac user, you get mixed messages about whether viruses and other malicious software pose a bona fide threat. Historically, Mac fans have touted their platform as immune to the kinds of data attacks and other hostile intrusions that plague the Windows world. Apple itself even reassured its customers for years that Macs “don’t get viruses.” It even said so in a series of commercials that first aired in 2006.

While it’s true Macs are more secure than PCs, they’re still vulnerable to viruses, and they always have been. By design, the Mac operating system is more secure against the threat of viruses and malware, but there are still plenty of ways for malware to find its way in. Another thing protecting Macs is the fact that they’re less popular than PCs, but that doesn’t stop some hackers from targeting Macs. Despite this, there are still tech pundits who recklessly advise against taking even basic security precautions, such as installing a cybersecurity program.

“Malwarebytes saw more Mac malware in 2017 than in any previous year.”

In the last few years, a growing number of active threats have targeted the Mac operating system. In fact, Malwarebytes saw more Mac malware in 2017 than in any previous year. By the end of 2017, the Malwarebytes intel team counted 270 percent more unique threats on the Mac platform than in 2016. What’s more, Apple’s current strategies may not be enough to stop the rising tide of Mac viruses and malware. Look into the history of threats to Macs, and you’ll see that even early on, the so-called “Mac invulnerability” was a myth. It makes you think twice about wandering around cyberspace on your Mac without taking precautions. (For further reading, see “Mac security facts and fallacies” by Thomas Reed.)

The latest Mac malware news

The state of Mac malware
Interesting disguise employed by new Mac malware HiddenLotus
Mac malware OSX.Proton strikes again

A short history of Mac attacks

The first widespread Apple virus was called Elk Cloner. It was created by a 15-year-old high school student in 1982, and it targeted Apple II computers. Disseminated by infected floppy disks, the virus itself was harmless, but it spread to all disks attached to a system. It proliferated so quickly that many consider it the first large-scale computer virus outbreak in history. Note that this was prior to any PC malware.

The first virus that targeted Macintosh computers, nVir, emerged in 1987 and remained a problem until 1991. It infected executable files on Macs, causing system issues like printing problems, application crashes, and slow response times. Compared to today’s malware that steals your identity or spies on you remotely, nVir’s annoyances seem quaint.

“nVir emerged in 1987 and remained a problem until 1991.”

Apple’s switch to a completely new architecture in 2001 helped squash such nasty bug invasions, but malware for OS X started to appear a few years later. Since roughly 2012, the number of Mac threats have seen a huge upswing. These threats include malware like spywarekeyloggersbackdoors, and more. It also includes Mac adware, and potentially unwanted programs (PUPs). All of these contribute to an increased risk for Macs. Even the Mac App Store has suffered a tidal wave of scam software. Go to any Mac forum these days and it won’t take you five minutes to find someone suffering from some kind of malicious threat.

Even as the first Mac virus threats appeared, they inspired counter measures. The first Mac antivirus programs were created in 1987 in response to nVIR and variants of nVIR. In addition, those of us sufficiently long in the tooth might even remember one of the most popular early Mac antivirus programs—a free utility named Disinfectant, released in 1989.

OS X security measures

Aware of the problem, Apple eventually replaced the classic Mac operating system with the new Mac OS X, which came with built-in malware security measures. For instance:

  • Quarantine, introduced in 2007, alerts users if they try to open applications downloaded from the Internet. It acts as a reminder, in effect prompting users to think twice before clicking—even if it’s a benign program. But Quarantine is useless against executable programs that download and launch by exploiting vulnerabilities in your browser, executing the so-called drive-by download.
  • Xprotect, added in 2009, prevents malware from being opened, but only if it carries a known signature from an ever-changing universe of malware programs. This means you have to keep updating the signature database to stay ahead of the latest threats. If that database lags behind, the bad guys get ahead.
  • Gatekeeper, which appeared in 2012, only allows installation of applications from the Mac App Store and its identified developers who have “signed’ their code. However, the modest fee to register as an identified developer, bad guy or not, presents a low barrier to getting around Gatekeeper. In other words, Mac malware often comes signed nowadays, so it looks legit to Gatekeeper.
  • There is also Malware Removal Tool, which removes known malware but only after infection, and only at certain times, such as when the computer restarts.

While these measures by Apple help lower the user’s risk, they’re not really sufficient. There are ways to bypass them, and they don’t block or detect all threat types.

Who do Mac viruses and other malware target?

The answer to that depends on the malware. Mac adware and Mac PUPs most often go after the average user, based on the assumption that Mac users are well-to-do and worth the effort. Other malware deploys in a targeted manner, such as nation-state malware, which goes after specific individuals or small groups.

Another likely vector is the developer community itself. In this sort of attack, often called supply-chain attacks, the hackers concentrate on breaching a developer’s server, allowing them to insert themselves in some part of a process between the writing and delivery of the app to users. Some time ago, a particularly widespread hack of this sort placed an infected copy of Xcode (a suite of Apple software development tools) on a developer’s servers, which subsequently affected tens of thousands of iOS apps. Once it was discovered, Apple went in and shut down all the infected copies of Xcode. (For further reading, see “XcodeGhost malware infiltrates App Store” by Thomas Reed.)

“Another likely vector is the developer community itself.”

Is my Mac infected?

How do you know if your Mac has a malware infection? Look for such clues as:

  • You land on a web page you’ve selected, and advertising banners start to intrude on you aggressively.
  • You notice that random web page text suddenly has a hyperlink.
  • Browser pop ups get in your face, earnestly recommending fake updates or other fake software.
  • You notice other unwanted adware programs, which you did not authorize or which were installed without your knowledge.
  • Your Mac crashes, heats up, or runs its fan faster than normal for no apparent reason. It may be working on an intensive task because of a cryptocurrency miner on your system, most likely installed by a Mac Trojan.

If you see any of the above, or other strange behavior, then it’s high time you got yourself some cybersecurity protection. Furthermore, though the general consumer may consider cybersecurity synonymous with the term “antivirus,” the more accurate designation should be “anti-malware,” a catch-all term that describes all malicious software, regardless of type. For example, viruses and Trojans are two specific types of malicious software, both of which are malware. The fact is, viruses are much less of a thing today, largely because there are far easier ways to infect Macs with Trojans, worms, spyware, and ransomware. (For further reading, see “How to tell if your Mac is infected” by Wendy Zamora.)

So how do I protect myself against Mac malware?

First of all, don’t fall for the hype. There’s nothing implicitly safer about a Mac except for the rarity of threats compared to Windows. As the Mac threat landscape continues to expand, most Mac users aren’t prepared for it, continuing to think they’re safe simply by virtue of using a Mac. This puts Mac users at higher risk of getting infected with something nasty.

“There’s nothing implicitly safer about a Mac except for the rarity of threats when compared to Windows.”

Secondly, always remember the “if it’s too good to be true” rule. If you get a perky pop up offering something free, put on your skeptical face and don’t touch that mouse. This often happens on risky websites, so it’s best to avoid them. If you look at the status bar at the bottom of your browser, it’ll usually show you the true URL of the site you’ll go to if you follow the link you’re mousing over (without clicking). Pay particular attention if the domain ends in an odd set of letters, i.e., something other than com, org, edu, or biz, to name a few. This may indicate it is a viper’s nest for malware.

Also, keep your software up to date, whether it’s the operating system, browser, or just about any program you frequently use. That way, you’ll avoid any malware that seeks to exploit any bugs in the code.

Remember, you are your own first line of defense, so stay vigilant. Beware of unsolicited email attachments and software from untrustworthy websites or peer-to-peer file transfer networks.

Finally, install a Mac cybersecurity or anti-malware program from a reputable vendor. This will protect you from malware that makes it past your good cybersecurity habits.

What to look for in a Mac cybersecurity (“antivirus”) program

What should the enlightened Mac user look for in a cybersecurity program?

  • Comprehensive, layered protection. It should be able to scan and detect viruses, as well as maintain proactive real-time defense against malware. The goal is to catch dangerous threats automatically, before they infect your Mac. This way, you don’t have to stress about it or rely on manual scans.
  • Detection of adware and potentially unwanted programs (PUPs). These annoyances can lurk on your machine, slowing down your Mac. You want security software that finds and quarantines them.
  • Remediation. After removing the threats, remediation corrects system changes, regardless of severity. This allows you to return to the machine’s “desired state.”

Of course, it’s best to have comprehensive protection before something—malware or otherwise—infects your Mac. If you do take a hit, hit back by downloading Malwarebytes for Mac, run a scan, and rest easier. It zaps and continues to block malware. It detects and quarantines adware and PUPs too, and it does it all with a low impact on system resources, so you don’t get bogged down. It can even recognize when new threats appear to be similar to the signatures of previously identified threats, providing protection against new, unidentified threats (zero-day).

Here’s your takeaway: Even on a Mac, safe computing is a matter of vigilance. Avoid opening unsolicited email attachments or downloading software from untrustworthy websites or peer-to-peer file transfer networks. Keeping security in mind can go a long way toward keeping you safe from some online threats, but not all of them. This is why a good Mac cybersecurity program is essential.

Who cares, Unless you want to make it Racist

Editorial: Hastings District Council snubs native tree plantings – again

Nikau palms on Auckland's Queen St show natives are a genuine urban option. Photo File
Nikau palms on Auckland’s Queen St show natives are a genuine urban option. Photo File
Hawkes Bay Today
By: Mark Story

Scotsman Allan “Tuki” McLean was likely embarrassed about having to use native timber to build Duart House.

The dearth of local stone forced him to incorporate pronounced joints and mock corner “stones” of heart totara in his Havelock North home. The resulting rusticated façade is a wooden home masquerading as a stone castle on the Isle of Mull.

And fair enough. The colonists were homesick and bursting with the pride of Empire.

But worryingly, 135 years on, native trees remain intensely embarrassing to Havelock North’s modern-day governors – Hastings District Council.

About 30 introduced trees on Napier Rd will soon be removed for a water main, only to be replaced with, wait for it – the golden elm.

Unbelievable, again.

Apparently an advocate of shoring up British botany, councillor Kevin Watkins this week said the elm “fits in with other plantings in the village”.

A weaker criterion for selection you’ll struggle to find. Surely this decision deserves more robust consideration than simply opting for horticultural homogenisation.

Why does the council think the introduced North Yorkshire specimen “fits” better than the native trees that stood in the area for thousands of years?

Culturally, ecologically or aesthetically, elms impart nothing like the dividend offered by a stand of rata.

Hastings ratepayers are continuing to bankroll the council’s cultural cringe.

I’m reminded of a line by New Zealand poet Allen Curnow: “Not I, some child, born in a marvellous year, will learn the trick of standing upright here”.

Here’s to the council learning the art of standing upright, and becoming as proud of home as Mr McLean.

Phil Twyford really is a special kind of stupid

by Cameron Slater on May 19, 2018 at 8:30am

Phil Twyford really does like showing us his special kind of stupid. Radio NZ reports: Quote:

Treasury is wrong in halving its forecast of the early impact of the Kiwibuild programme, Housing Minister Phil Twyford says.

Treasury expects the government’s building programme to add $2.5 billion to the economy over five years, with its real contribution coming later than previously forecast.

Mr Twyford said a higher forecast from the Ministry of Building, Innovation and Employment was much more in tune with the construction industry.

Treasury have made a number of highly questionable assumptions,

“It’s almost a hypothetical or academic exercise trying to model the effect on overall residential investment. I think they’re simply wrong and it’s unfortunate.”

National housing spokesperson Judith Collins said Treasury’s forecast meant KiwiBuild would contribute “half as much to the building of new houses as Mr Twyford has spent years claiming”.

“He’s arrogantly said all those experts are wrong and he’s right.

“In the last few weeks alone Mr Twyford has been forced to admit he won’t build the number of houses he promised, he won’t build them for the total cost he claimed and he won’t be able to sell them for the price he promised.

“To make matters worse, confidence in the residential construction sector is waning because the government is making it harder to find skilled tradespeople to build the houses as well as to get the credit to pay for the houses.”

Treasury also forecast Budget surpluses to rise gradually, from an improved $3.7 billion in the year ended 30 June, 2018, to $7.3bn in 2022.

It has forecast net debt to fall to 19.1 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2022.

It expected growth would rise from 2.8 percent in the June 2018 year to peak at 3.6 percent in late 2019 before easing back to 2.5 percent by 2022 due to rising interest rates and slowing jobs growth. End quote.

In his interview with TVNZ he made one especially stupid statement: Quote:

major stoush has broken out between the Housing Minister and Treasurywith Phil Twyford slamming some of those working at the Government’s lead economic and financial adviser as “kids.”

That’s after Treasury downgraded its forecast over how much extra housing investment Kiwibuild will deliver to the economy.

Builders are under the pump and construction is being delayed on some new houses by at least a year.

“We’re really busy as an industry and just forever I get reports of builders wanting more and more people. And they’re just not available, so we’re in a pretty chronic position currently,” Grant Florence of the NZ Certified Builders Association told 1 NEWS.

It has prompted Treasury to downgrade its forecasts for the Government’s Kiwibuild programme.

“I just think some of these kids in Treasury are just fresh out of university and they’re completely disconnected from reality,” Mr Twyford said.

National’s housing spokesperson Judith Collins said her experience is “you should always listen to Treasury”.

“They’re not always going to be exactly the way they see things, but ultimately they’re looking at it from a dispassionate point of view and independent point of view,” she said.

Before Christmas, Treasury said Kiwibuild would result in $5.4 billion of extra residential investment by 2022.

Now it has slashed that number in half, saying some of that investment won’t happen as quickly.

“One of the mistakes I think Treasury have made is that they’ve assumed that the investment has to be made before the houses are built,” Mr Twyford said.

The Government has also promised to build 1600 state houses a year.

Currently there are almost 8000 households in need of state housing and National says it would have built more.

“National went into the last election promising over 6,000 state houses over the next three years. So we were promising on 2000 a year,” Ms Collins said.

Mr Twyford said: “The opposition had nine years and they allowed the housing crisis to spin out of control.”

The Government is promising there’s no change in its plan to build more houses, and there will still be 100,000 affordable homes in a decade. End quote.

What an utter moron. Abusing civil servants is one of the first signs that you aren’t coping. Then uttering stupid statements like his one on investment just proves that you are under pressure, don’t understand your portfolio and are losing the argument.

Phil Twyford is the government’s biggest risk right now. He also needs to get some body language coaching to try to cover up when he is lying.

I’m not sure abusing Treasury officials is particularly smart. All he has done is show that when under pressure the Labour party return to form as the Nasty party.

Prayers please for the Ministry of Truth

by Guest Post on March 13, 2018 at 9:37am
Guest Post:

All prayers this morning, please, directed to the toilers and drones at The Ministry of Truth who worked so long and so hard overnight, expunging at the memory hole, and must now, surely, be weary and worthy of rest.

Less than ten hours ago NZyounglabour’s facebook displayed a post from February 13th speaking of summer school and happiness and bliss:

Thumbnail

The poster cheerfully added several photographs showing aspects of the little event, yet now there is nothing, all the photos, in fact the entire post; gone. What is this?

ThumbnailCuriouser and curiouser, creeping as far down the memory hole as possible with limited tech-ability, the internetty thingameebob showed me that I hadn’t been dreamin’, as the Ministry of Truth now want me to believe, there had been pictures after all:

Thumbnail

All since deleted. What could have been so offensive, or embarrassing, that cremation in the memory hole was called for by Big Sister? Could it be that the pictures may contradict the correct narrative? Could it be the NZYL watermark? Could it be that Big Sister doesn’t want anybody to recognise any faces from the event, lest someone approach them for comment? We don’t know, and won’t know because they won’t tell us, leaving us to form our own conclusions. Personally; I don’t understand the mad panic for removal. It looked a perfectly inoffensive event to me:

Thumbnail

NZ Labour Party: Scrubbing their own history for over a century.

by idbkiwi

What? No wisecracks from Labour over double-dipping?

by Cameron Slater on February 21, 2018 at 8:30am

Labour made much of Bill English’s housing issues when he was snapped double-dipping.

Strangely, there isn’t a peep from the usual suspects about Jacinda Ardern’s and Winston Peters’ own double-dipping:

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters were both mistakenly paid over $21,000 for accommodation they didn’t need.  

The pair put out a press release on Tuesday afternoon explaining the overpayment, which resulted from the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) continuing to pay them an accommodation allowance despite each moving into an official residence.

Ardern received $12,205.49 while Peters received $9123. They have both repaid the amount in full and received an apology for the error.

As soon as we were advised of the error, we both immediately took steps to reimburse the money.  That has now happened,” the pair said.

Good. At least they’ve paid it back.

“The error occurred when the DIA’s Ministerial Services continued to pay each of us a Member of Parliament’s Wellington accommodation allowance after they had moved us into official accommodation, at which point payments should have stopped.”

Neither had asked DIA for the payment.

“While mistakes happen, we have accepted the officials’ apology. Appropriate use of taxpayer money is something we both take extremely seriously, and we have set a high bar for ourselves and others.”

The mistake came to light as DIA prepared for their proactive release of ministerial expenses.

Non-Wellington based MPs receive an accommodation allowance in order to cover Wellington housing costs.

Outgoing National leader Bill English claimed $32,000 in accommodation allowance while living in a Karori home owned by a trust in the late 2000s.

He paid it all back when media uncovered the allowance in 2009.

I bet they both get a free pass. This will be a once-over-lightly story from the Media party.

I’d sure know if I had a stray $9k floating through my accounts.

Islamic terrorism in New Zealand 2018

by SB on February 16, 2018 at 10:00am

frightening-passages-in-the-koran-that-can-be-linked-to-isis-behavior

We always said that it was not a matter of if but when. All the warning signs were there. We had seen it happen in Western country after Western country, including our neighbour Australia, but did our politicians do anything differently? No, they did not. Now New Zealand is paying the price because of weak leaders who put Twitter outrage and their personal popularity before the protection and safety of New Zealand’s citizens.

Kiwi teenager radicalised online planned mass killing in Christchurch ‘for Allah’

The teenager left school at 15, converted to Islam and became radicalised online. He was sentenced in the Christchurch District Court […] over a violent incident he later admitted he planned as a terror attack.

A Kiwi teenager radicalised online planned to ram a car into a group of people in Christchurch and then stab them.

 

The teenager wrote a goodbye note to his mother, then started a violent incident, but has since told a psychologist when it began he “decided not to hurt anybody because he did not have the means to kill enough people”,

“The reason no-one was hurt was that he did not have access to knives,” Lange said. But there was significant premeditation, and hostility towards non-Muslims.

The teen, who was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, harboured thoughts for five months of killing multiple people. He expected police to kill him once his rampage started.

After his arrest, the youth told police he was angry and had “done it for Allah”. He had left school at age 15, become socially isolated, and converted to Islam.

The court has adopted a rehabilitative approach to the teen’s sentencing, with Judge Stephen O’Driscoll releasing him on intensive supervision with a list of conditions and a warning that if he breaches the conditions or reoffends, he will likely be sent to prison.

Among the conditions – which will apply for two years while the judge monitors his progress – is counselling by a member of the local Muslim community.

 

The youth’s name is suppressed and the details of the offending cannot be published. He has admitted eight charges. People were frightened by his actions during the incident last year, and damage was done, but no-one was hurt before he was held until the police arrived.

Lange said even though the youth had been treated for months by the youth forensic psychiatric team, he was still seen as a high risk of reoffending, and a risk to family members and members of the public.

He said the primary consideration was the protection of the community, and the teenager’s rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

[…] He urged intensive supervision be imposed because prison would mean limited access to the rehabilitation and socialising programmes he needed. The strict conditions proposed for the intensive supervision were “almost unheard of”, he said.

In prison, he would be radicalised even further. Overseas in other Western countries, many violent and mentally ill criminals are converted to Islam. Some are even forced to join the Muslim gangs inside the prison in order to stay alive.

He urged the suppression orders be made. “His rehabilitation would be affected by his name being published and him becoming in any way a celebrity of sorts, or someone of note,” he said.

Judge O’Driscoll said the teen’s rehabilitation would benefit the community in the long run, but he said it was one of the most difficult sentencings he had ever been involved in. “There is a need to deter you, denounce your conduct, and protect the community.”

“There was a disinterest in what is seen as the moderate point of view. You had thoughts which most people who live in a civilised society would find unacceptable.”

If the judge was familiar with the Koran then he would realise that sending him to a member of the local Muslim community was 100% the wrong thing to do. It was Islamic ideology and the Koran that were used to radicalise him. He needs to be deprogrammed by the kind of person who works with cult members, not handed over to a so-called “moderate” Muslim who may be well meaning but who will not have the skills required.

In America, some Muslim citizens used to counsel terrorists like this boy have been later discovered to be doing completely the opposite. This is not a good precedent that the judge has set. This is not a problem for the Muslim community to solve. It is a problem that requires professionals specialised in deprogramming cult members because that is what Islamic terrorists are.

Pre-sentence reports indicated he had the potential to act more violently than what happened.

He was diagnosed as having post traumatic stress disorder and would need regular intensive community follow-up.

Judge O’Driscoll told the teenager police had contacted a person from the local Muslim community to meet him regularly for counselling.

“Everyone is really wanting to help and assist you, so you don’t engage in acts of violence and harm innocent members of the community.”

He released the youth under intensive supervision for two years, under GPS monitoring and living in supervised accommodation.

The conditions include assessment, counselling and treatment as directed by the probation officer or a psychologist. He will have to live at a particular address and be monitored by the judge with regular reports.

He has interim name suppression, but that would not be made a permanent order until he successfully completed the supervision sentence. Judge O’Driscoll will get regular monitoring reports on his progress, the first in a month’s time.[…]